– but a lot of it, as a result of Richard Stallman’s objections, did not. Please don't turn Emacs into a multi-language platform..I agree with most of your other points, the world would be better of without XEmacs, and sharing backend with a popular browser (gecko, webkit...) would be an interesting path. firefox with the firemacs add on + conkeror but is also using a window manager configurable in common lisp which he does using slime from emacshttp://bc.tech.coop/blog/index.htmlinteresting setup. I want it to be the same everywhere, so that when I use it, I don't *use* it, I *am* it. The XEmacs Sourceforge page is still around, but appears to have received its last set of updates in 2009. But apparently, when i needed an editor at work, it was a Windows Emacs package that came up first in the search. There was an awful lot of finger-pointing about this, and I have no idea whether that was a good or a bad outcome. XEmacs FAQ. For a description of the XEmacs install tree, please consult the NEWS file. Its current maintainer, Stephen Turnbull, is a regular participant on GNU Emacs dev forum. 2017年7月27日 閲覧。 “Luckily many of the package maintainers are attempting to make their modules work with both Xemacs and Gnu Emacs, though the functionality may not be identical.” Here's my solution:(require 'desktop)(defun david-session-start () (interactive) (david-kill-C-x-C-c) (desktop-read) (run-with-timer 0 120 'desktop-save "~/"))(defun david-kill-C-x-C-c () (interactive) (define-key global-map [(control x) (control c)] (lambda () (interactive) (message "No! I would love some kind of "buffer like" thing with a cairo canvas, on which I could draw with elisp. XEmacs is a self-documenting, customizable, extensible, real-time display editor Display: text is visible on the screen and is updated automatically as you type (c.f. Lucid was a Silicon Valley startup that developed Lisp machine-style Common Lisp environments for mainstream workstations. This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public License.Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any other license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction that derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the same restriction. Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an open software development model, similar to Linux. "Idle time in seconds needed before dframe will update itself. ... From this version onwards I won't be making Eicq available as an XEmacs Package. The last major release was XEmacs 21 in 1999; the last minor release to be promoted stable was XEmacs 21.4 in 2003, and the last maintenance release was XEmacs 21.4.22 in 2009. Emacs starts up a lot faster than any similarly-sized Java app; yet they are both bytecode systems.It's also time to start mainstreaming voice input to complement the keyboard and mouse.Bytecode systems are increasingly obsolete. Currently using 21.4. Garbage collection? XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. And there the story ends. Jamie> Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, Jamie> I'll use regular expressions." Of all your writings, i almost agree whole heartedly, and the more i read, the more i see the years of experience and wisdom behind it.However, there's something out of the ordinary today. Regardless, Lucid needed those features to move ahead with Energize, so they ended up releasing their own version of Emacs 19, known as Lucid Emacs or Lemacs for short (as opposed to what they called FSF Emacs or FSFmacs for short). Most GNU/Linux distributions provide GNU Emacs in their repositories, which is the recommended way to install Emacs unless you always want to use the latest release. Resistance is futile. 2017年7月27日 閲覧。 “Luckily many of the package maintainers are attempting to make their modules work with both Xemacs and Gnu Emacs, though the functionality may not be identical.” It seems diplomatic to me at least; Zawinski describes it as “pusillanimous” (showing ignoble cowardice, or contemptible timidity). So everything got undone back to the point where I started to edit.I now install the Heritage Toolkit "vi" everywhere I can't upgrade Vim or replace it with Nvi or the like. The McCain/Obama/Clinton reference in "At this point it's becoming painful to watch. What were the features that caused users to jump ship? Hah!I for one hope you never do...Great article! Why can't we just tack on Guile or extend JavaScript to do that? I've been using this for several months and it always works well. This FAQ is freely redistributable. From about '79, i've been using flavors of emacs, starting with FINE (Fine Is Not Emacs) and it's bigger brother COURSE. Minibuffer Getting Help. Start coding that emacs extension for Firefox now, instead of losing time trying to resist. Think C was awesome on a 1 MIPS 68K Mac with 2 MB RAM. And then GNU Emacs kept changing the rules for how to set ^h to 'back-hacking-tabs'. I do use a lot of the R and S programming language and a couple of years ago moved over to gnu emacs after over 6 years of xemacs. Exiting XEmacs C-x C-c Screen Organization. Did somebody plant rumors about a “steering committee” in order to drive a wedge between Lucid and FSF? In this FAQ, we use the name “Emacs” only for the official version. Long Live Emacs!" Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an open software development model, similar to Linux. Lucid Emacs has since been renamed XEmacs. If the XEmacs guys move over to GNUEmacs, will they get the same status they had under XE? And, i think that effectly stopped me from wanting to contribute back to FSF on emacs, either of existing code or ideas)It is relatively easy to contribute to FSF emacs by snippets of code, or a module. As far as I know, XEmacs is effectively dead; the version you installed is 7+ years old. It is protected under the GNU Public License and related to other versions of Emacs, in particular GNU Emacs. You should gone for "Emacs is Dead. A nonpartisan account of the state of XEmacs in its twilight. You have to settle on some cross-platform-editor. Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an … You can get the source code here: Lisp: typing.el; A game for fast typers! And the results show.A text editor should be like a text field - it doesn't need menus, it doesn't need modern GUI buttons and dialogues and stuff. The XEmacs manual is similar to the GNU Emacs Manual, from which it forked at the same time that the XEmacs software forked from GNU Emacs. What's the point? To this day there are traces of XEmacs in the core Emacs code: The typical pattern for dealing with XEmacs compatibility is to check for (featurep 'xemacs), as in the following: So why was XEmacs such a big deal? It is protected under the GNU Public License and related to other versions of Emacs, in particular GNU Emacs. Emacs runs on several operating systems regardless of the machine type. Either way, Emacs is going to need to adopt many TextMate features in the coming years, if it hopes to compete, a very difficult or even impossible feat, as it will mean breaking backwards-compatibility with existing Emacs infrastructure. I used XEmacs for a long long time, but switched over to GNU Emacs at around pre-version 21 when it suddenly had almost everything that XEmacs had. Probably somebody still uses it, and the website is up, but I have not personally heard of anyone using it any time recently. Who needs byte code? XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. Firefox with text editing capabilities? If XEmacs dissapears, I would stop using any kind of emacs. I don't even drink coffee. Gentoo's Bugzilla – Bug 11628 xemacs has trouble finding its mule packages Last modified: 2003-02-04 19:42:18 UTC node [gannet] Naturally, users liked having access to all that GUI goodness (Zawinski referred to it as “an attempt to … make Emacs be a good citizen of modern GUI desktops”), and so they switched. I want to try XEmacs and it's special features. If we assume that his idea is good, it will amass users quickly in a few short years, then, the GNU emacs will quickly adapt. I'm not suggesting that we switch back.However, i'm convinced that the quality of Lisp code out there has more to do with the barrier to entry than anything inherent in the language. Please stop using "blog" to mean "blog post". XEmacs has awesome tabbing which makes "make -C ~/src/some-random-directory" extremely pleasant. The maintainers have done a wonderful job, as always. To learn more about Xemacs, including the keyboard commands, run the Xemacs tutorial by typing ``Control-h t''. XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. Zawinski’s firsthand partisan account of working on Lemacs is a great read, but even more valuable than that is a long list of archived emails from 1992 involving the principal actors of the whole saga: Zawinski, Richard Stallman, Lucid founder Richard Gabriel, etc. The barrier to entry is high, so the really bad drivers stay home. Its development is currently inactive, with the most recent stable version 21.4.22 released in January 2009 (while a beta was released in 2013), while GNU Emacs has implemented many formerly XEmacs-only features. Man, it has a lot of bugs. Very nice.Does emacs have a Bugzilla or Trac system going yet? The FSF sees copyright assignment to the FSF as necessary to allow it to defend the code against GPL violations, while the XEmacs developers have argued that the lack of copyright assignment has allowed major companies to get involved, as so… A nonpartisan account of the state of XEmacs in its twilight. Something like OpenKomodo?Or did you really mean integrating the capabilities in Firefox itself? For me, i started to use emacs in 1998, and from 1998-2005, i'm using xemacs 100% of the time purely for practical reasons. I really wish there was a book on JavaScript that wasn't centered on use in web PAGES.it's Turing complete, I can do whatever I want with it, and right now I want to better understand my /.conkerorrc folder's contents and the Conkeror source.In any case, in a couple years, I'm willing to bet I won't be using Emacs much, despite my increased use of it at the moment.Part of me is a bit sad, as I like Lisps. The original EMacs used ITS TECO as it's extension language. It's often more fun to be captain of a small boat than a deckhand on a big ship. Where did this idea come from? Everything up to now has been more or less a rehash of the same old XEmacs story, without anything fundamentally new. It's an emacs-inspired web browser built on top of XUL. A diplomatic description of the differences, techincal and otherwise, between Emacs and XEmacs. The you might like http://aquamacs.org/Think GNU Emacs but it behaves like a Mac application. It does this without performance penalty by not only embedding an interpreter in the editor, but a full compiler, and one that does pretty well in the performance shootouts.I just need to find the time.... We work on XEmacs because it's more fun to work on this code than on other code. Point is, use both. I say this from experience. I no more notice what commands I am using, 99% of the time, than I notice what muscles I am using to type them.The only problems I've had is that "vi" is usually Vim on modern systems, and all versions of Vim before 7.0 were abysmal implementations of "ex". I am curious about the prospects of that project. Here are the most useful find replace commands for current file. However, to change it in atypical way, such as modernize its documentation out of its 1980's context and writing in a systematic non-trivial update, or modernize its GUI out of the build up from 1980's ways, or, as you suggest, introducing or integrating or embracing some VM... am afraid will be nigh impossible, or take a long, long, long, time.For me, i feel the most urgent change emacs needs is a few basic interface changes, detailed here: http://xahlee.org/emacs/modernization.htmlThe most effective method to make a stratedgic change, is, like Xemacs has done, or as Aquamacs has done, by simply having a capable person fork his own version with his vision, out in the public. What I mean is, it made sense 20 years ago to have a terminal-non-GUI environment that is in itself almost an operating system.But considering that we now live in a GUI world, be it Macs, Windows and even Linux with Gnome/KDE in spite of its 'terminal' heritage.I don't need and I really don't want to have a text-based web browser within my editor. Xah xah@xahlee.org∑ http://xahlee.org/☄. LWN.net re-visits the emacs-devel mailing list, where the Emacs 28 development cycle has revived discussions about how to make the text editor more "modern" and attractive to new users: A default dark theme may not be in the future, leading one to think that there may yet be hope for the world in general. Yet, my peers know even less about editing, and want me to make the big sweeping changes, because all they know is copy and paste. @sonoflilit well, kind of.As I said, I am not an Emacs user and that's the point: learning-curve. I was already a doubting thomas, but Aquamacs put the final stake in it (of course, RMS doesn't like Aquamacs either, but that's another story). Dead Keys On some non-English systems running Linux, trying to type an accented character, for example with a tilde ( ~ ), will result in Emacs spitting out “ is undefined”. I try to imagine integrating Ruby's object system into e-lisp or trying to call a macro from Python, and it seems like that for the languages to interoperate, you'd have to loose the a lot of the meta-programming techiniques from all languages which make them so popular in the first place, or, at least restrict them so they don't carry over between languages. That warmonger VIM is sitting back and laughing at us. > Port to XUL, maybe?Are you familiar with conkeror? To the Textmate/Mac user: check out Aquamacs at aquamacs.org -- it's an OS X / Aqua port of Emacs. At least not on me but in some beta version and then also during some migration from Xfree to Xorgs X11 variant. It offered features that Emacs didn’t have, and therefore caused a schism among Emacs users. The main ones are: GNU, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, MacOS, MS Windows and Solaris. > As soon as emacs gets proportional anti-aliased fonts, I'll switch. I think he's nominalizing the verb "to blog²" to create a new noun "blog³", like this: I borked this yesterday -> I made a bork yesterday I grokked something today -> I had a grok today I blogged² about OSX -> I worked on a blog³ about OSX.That there was already a noun "blog¹" with a different meaning is irrelevant to this proccess; what matters is that the verb "to blog²" means "to create a blog¹ post", not "to create a blog¹". Now they have two problems. Several of XEmacs's principal developers have published accounts of the split between XEmacs and GNU Emacs, for example, Stephen Turnbull's summary of the arguments from both sides. What of it? I am glad I did.I just wish all the brains developing for emacs would get back under the same tent. I think something got garbled in transmission. In EmacsAsOperatingSystem and UnixCulture there is the comment that "Emacs is a refugee from the long dead culture of LispMachines. Monnier is an Emacs maintainer. Last time I looked the core pieces of Emacs were still written in C.Still, Emacs has some really attractive properties: it's extensible (of course) and it's reflective (or perhaps introspective) in that its extension language can inspect and modify itself. Thanks Stevey, you have also inspired me to get cracking at improving rails-mode for emacs. Extending it with C, the way most extensions do has one fatal flaw...a bad extension can crash the browser. The CLR is *not* winning the multiple languages race, though they're making a good showing and catching up quickly. xemacs free download. Probably the XEmacs supplied malloc could be removed too as dead code but, who knows, on some old system that could still be useful!? And Gabriel dispairs that really good looking Lisp code runs really slow. To be clear, nothing here is firsthand information. Out of curiosity and for some research I tried to look into the current state of the project and found that the site www.xemacs.org appears to be unreachable. I've heard that on the #emacs irc people mention how emacs needs to be rewritten and that emacs as a whole is dying since many users are older users and emacs is picking up newer users slower. I made the point that all it really needs is a solid text editing component that can handle all the stuff you need for a typical editor (syntax highlighting, mainly), and the rest is relatively simple. It reminds me of my beloved save-tabs-on-exit in Firefox 3b5. My one missing feature is good tab completion in the M-x compile minibuffer. Best Community Development Corporations, Handmade Marbles Uk, Strawberry Cake Cookies With Cream Cheese, Withings Body Cardio Scale Manual, Calendula Homeopathy Cream, Best Biohacks Reddit, Prague Weather October, Short Proverbs About Life, " />

is xemacs dead

is xemacs dead

There was quite a bit to be said for it. Cutting and Pasting ; C-SPC: Mark one end of region: C-w: Cut (after you Mark and move to other end) M-w: Copy (after you Mark and move to other end) C-y: Yank (paste) most recently killed (cut or copied); will also use text currently selected in another application. But I can't stand RMS, that software socialist.Therefore I use XEmacs, because it's much more liberal in my eyes. ; Alt+x query-replace-regexp 【Ctrl+Alt+%】 → interactive find replace with regex, on active region, or cusor point to end. That can be specified by passing the --prefix flag to configure. I am really willing to try to learn it. Long Live XEmacs!”. !Sorry :). I wish this would happen. My experiences of using them is sum'd up here: http://xahlee.org/emacs/emacs_vs_xemacs.htmlAbout your thesis that emacs is under threat of platforms such as modern browser... i think it is a very insightful point.Making changes to emacs in some fundamental way wont be easy, not when RMS is ruling the party. The root cause is that Emacs and some input method managers (ibus and SCIM) don’t work together; see Ubuntu bugs #1251176 and #493766 . The last major release was XEmacs 21 in 1999; the last minor release to be promoted stable was XEmacs 21.4 in 2003, and the last maintenance release was XEmacs 21.4.22 in 2009. It took me and Mike McMahon endless hours to implement so many commands to make ZWEI/Zmacs.Now, if you mean reimplement the core of GNU [X]Emacs, the stuff that's written in C, so that the existing elisp can all be used, that's more realistic. I was a die-hard xemacs user from 1996 until early 2008. I've been an XEmacs user for years now, mostly out of habit more than anything else. 10000x slimmer. Pages there haven't been updated for 5 or 10 years. I predict that Conkeror will have basic text editing abilities within 12 months.It will be in Debian once XULRunner 1.9 gets there, for you folks scared of running the git version. It’s a big ’un, this time. My Emacs experience has become so limited, i've started using Vim. 2014年12月1日 閲覧。 ^ “A Comparison of Xemacs and Gnu Emacs”. XEmacs Mailing List Archives. Anyways, it spooked me enough to make me realize that it's not *real* emacs. Or at least large pieces of itself. Heh. Manage lists; Login; Sign Up; Login; Sign Up; Manage this list Recently, his last email to me was “please don't be ridiculous”. This is a game inspired by The Typing Of The Dead.That game itself is a parody of The House Of The Dead.In the latter, players use a … Steve, we are Mozilla. XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. I recall doing a matrix transpose in TECO off the top of my head. Don't get me wrong. Long Live XEmacs!”. When I type, it's not "I tell my fingers what to type", I just type. Alt+x query-replace 【Alt+%】 → interactive find/replace on active region, or cursor point to end. That would be the main way to make Firefox more emacs-like....with Javascript. I tweeted a coupla wh00ts about UltraEdit and a buddy pointed me to this post.Ok, so I don't use XEmacs.But I gotta say: finding an article like this refreshes my belief that there's sentient life on Spaceship Earth.wh00t wh000t! Maybe that'll be the solution!! (as another has pointed out in this thread) sorry for this rather negative opinion, but is just my opinion as is. It is protected under the GNU Public License and related to other versions of Emacs, in particular GNU Emacs. Unfortunately it doesn't look like they've published any reports yet, so I can't say much more. XEmacs's current semi-dead status is well relfected from its website xemacs.org. Only 2 kinds; 32-bit and 64-bit. The "ex" troglodyte speaks:I don't want an editor to be configurable, extensible, self-hosting, or anything else. As far as I know, XEmacs is effectively dead; the version you installed is 7+ years old. It isn’t much now, but it caused quite a stir in its heyday. It is unfortunate, since XEmacs really is ahead of emacs in many technical ways. You wrote:«I'd also count among their legacies an absolutely outstanding collection of software essays called Patterns of Software, by Lucid's founder, Richard P. Gabriel. I do run it for weeks at the time without experiencing crashes. Internationalization. It wasn't because Emacs is more reliable or has fresh minty taste. It's just how the world works, by natural competition.I didn't write this reply preplanned... but now at this point, i'm thinking, Steve: you are the one. Other systems, such as Smalltalk and the Lively Kernel, referenced above, share these properties.By the way, I think it is possible for Java to be truly self-hosting. I've been using XEmacs for a few years and have not seen any of the instability you're talking about; and I leave XEmacs instance running for a long time. It had some weird behavior that I could live with. This could also be a problem for "core code 21.4" but I have not verified that. I go back and re-read them every year or so. Jamie Zawinski, “The Lemacs/FSFmacs Schism”, 2000. A lot of that work ended up in Emacs – the Elisp byte code compiler, for instance, is credited to Jamie Zawinski – but a lot of it, as a result of Richard Stallman’s objections, did not. Please don't turn Emacs into a multi-language platform..I agree with most of your other points, the world would be better of without XEmacs, and sharing backend with a popular browser (gecko, webkit...) would be an interesting path. firefox with the firemacs add on + conkeror but is also using a window manager configurable in common lisp which he does using slime from emacshttp://bc.tech.coop/blog/index.htmlinteresting setup. I want it to be the same everywhere, so that when I use it, I don't *use* it, I *am* it. The XEmacs Sourceforge page is still around, but appears to have received its last set of updates in 2009. But apparently, when i needed an editor at work, it was a Windows Emacs package that came up first in the search. There was an awful lot of finger-pointing about this, and I have no idea whether that was a good or a bad outcome. XEmacs FAQ. For a description of the XEmacs install tree, please consult the NEWS file. Its current maintainer, Stephen Turnbull, is a regular participant on GNU Emacs dev forum. 2017年7月27日 閲覧。 “Luckily many of the package maintainers are attempting to make their modules work with both Xemacs and Gnu Emacs, though the functionality may not be identical.” Here's my solution:(require 'desktop)(defun david-session-start () (interactive) (david-kill-C-x-C-c) (desktop-read) (run-with-timer 0 120 'desktop-save "~/"))(defun david-kill-C-x-C-c () (interactive) (define-key global-map [(control x) (control c)] (lambda () (interactive) (message "No! I would love some kind of "buffer like" thing with a cairo canvas, on which I could draw with elisp. XEmacs is a self-documenting, customizable, extensible, real-time display editor Display: text is visible on the screen and is updated automatically as you type (c.f. Lucid was a Silicon Valley startup that developed Lisp machine-style Common Lisp environments for mainstream workstations. This work is licensed to you under version 2 of the GNU General Public License.Alternatively, you may choose to receive this work under any other license that grants the right to use, copy, modify, and/or distribute the work, as long as that license imposes the restriction that derivative works have to grant the same rights and impose the same restriction. Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an open software development model, similar to Linux. "Idle time in seconds needed before dframe will update itself. ... From this version onwards I won't be making Eicq available as an XEmacs Package. The last major release was XEmacs 21 in 1999; the last minor release to be promoted stable was XEmacs 21.4 in 2003, and the last maintenance release was XEmacs 21.4.22 in 2009. Emacs starts up a lot faster than any similarly-sized Java app; yet they are both bytecode systems.It's also time to start mainstreaming voice input to complement the keyboard and mouse.Bytecode systems are increasingly obsolete. Currently using 21.4. Garbage collection? XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. And there the story ends. Jamie> Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, Jamie> I'll use regular expressions." Of all your writings, i almost agree whole heartedly, and the more i read, the more i see the years of experience and wisdom behind it.However, there's something out of the ordinary today. Regardless, Lucid needed those features to move ahead with Energize, so they ended up releasing their own version of Emacs 19, known as Lucid Emacs or Lemacs for short (as opposed to what they called FSF Emacs or FSFmacs for short). Most GNU/Linux distributions provide GNU Emacs in their repositories, which is the recommended way to install Emacs unless you always want to use the latest release. Resistance is futile. 2017年7月27日 閲覧。 “Luckily many of the package maintainers are attempting to make their modules work with both Xemacs and Gnu Emacs, though the functionality may not be identical.” It seems diplomatic to me at least; Zawinski describes it as “pusillanimous” (showing ignoble cowardice, or contemptible timidity). So everything got undone back to the point where I started to edit.I now install the Heritage Toolkit "vi" everywhere I can't upgrade Vim or replace it with Nvi or the like. The McCain/Obama/Clinton reference in "At this point it's becoming painful to watch. What were the features that caused users to jump ship? Hah!I for one hope you never do...Great article! Why can't we just tack on Guile or extend JavaScript to do that? I've been using this for several months and it always works well. This FAQ is freely redistributable. From about '79, i've been using flavors of emacs, starting with FINE (Fine Is Not Emacs) and it's bigger brother COURSE. Minibuffer Getting Help. Start coding that emacs extension for Firefox now, instead of losing time trying to resist. Think C was awesome on a 1 MIPS 68K Mac with 2 MB RAM. And then GNU Emacs kept changing the rules for how to set ^h to 'back-hacking-tabs'. I do use a lot of the R and S programming language and a couple of years ago moved over to gnu emacs after over 6 years of xemacs. Exiting XEmacs C-x C-c Screen Organization. Did somebody plant rumors about a “steering committee” in order to drive a wedge between Lucid and FSF? In this FAQ, we use the name “Emacs” only for the official version. Long Live Emacs!" Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an open software development model, similar to Linux. Lucid Emacs has since been renamed XEmacs. If the XEmacs guys move over to GNUEmacs, will they get the same status they had under XE? And, i think that effectly stopped me from wanting to contribute back to FSF on emacs, either of existing code or ideas)It is relatively easy to contribute to FSF emacs by snippets of code, or a module. As far as I know, XEmacs is effectively dead; the version you installed is 7+ years old. It is protected under the GNU Public License and related to other versions of Emacs, in particular GNU Emacs. You should gone for "Emacs is Dead. A nonpartisan account of the state of XEmacs in its twilight. You have to settle on some cross-platform-editor. Its emphasis is on modern graphical user interface support and an … You can get the source code here: Lisp: typing.el; A game for fast typers! And the results show.A text editor should be like a text field - it doesn't need menus, it doesn't need modern GUI buttons and dialogues and stuff. The XEmacs manual is similar to the GNU Emacs Manual, from which it forked at the same time that the XEmacs software forked from GNU Emacs. What's the point? To this day there are traces of XEmacs in the core Emacs code: The typical pattern for dealing with XEmacs compatibility is to check for (featurep 'xemacs), as in the following: So why was XEmacs such a big deal? It is protected under the GNU Public License and related to other versions of Emacs, in particular GNU Emacs. Emacs runs on several operating systems regardless of the machine type. Either way, Emacs is going to need to adopt many TextMate features in the coming years, if it hopes to compete, a very difficult or even impossible feat, as it will mean breaking backwards-compatibility with existing Emacs infrastructure. I used XEmacs for a long long time, but switched over to GNU Emacs at around pre-version 21 when it suddenly had almost everything that XEmacs had. Probably somebody still uses it, and the website is up, but I have not personally heard of anyone using it any time recently. Who needs byte code? XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. Firefox with text editing capabilities? If XEmacs dissapears, I would stop using any kind of emacs. I don't even drink coffee. Gentoo's Bugzilla – Bug 11628 xemacs has trouble finding its mule packages Last modified: 2003-02-04 19:42:18 UTC node [gannet] Naturally, users liked having access to all that GUI goodness (Zawinski referred to it as “an attempt to … make Emacs be a good citizen of modern GUI desktops”), and so they switched. I want to try XEmacs and it's special features. If we assume that his idea is good, it will amass users quickly in a few short years, then, the GNU emacs will quickly adapt. I'm not suggesting that we switch back.However, i'm convinced that the quality of Lisp code out there has more to do with the barrier to entry than anything inherent in the language. Please stop using "blog" to mean "blog post". XEmacs has awesome tabbing which makes "make -C ~/src/some-random-directory" extremely pleasant. The maintainers have done a wonderful job, as always. To learn more about Xemacs, including the keyboard commands, run the Xemacs tutorial by typing ``Control-h t''. XEmacs is a highly customizable open source text editor and application development system. Zawinski’s firsthand partisan account of working on Lemacs is a great read, but even more valuable than that is a long list of archived emails from 1992 involving the principal actors of the whole saga: Zawinski, Richard Stallman, Lucid founder Richard Gabriel, etc. The barrier to entry is high, so the really bad drivers stay home. Its development is currently inactive, with the most recent stable version 21.4.22 released in January 2009 (while a beta was released in 2013), while GNU Emacs has implemented many formerly XEmacs-only features. Man, it has a lot of bugs. Very nice.Does emacs have a Bugzilla or Trac system going yet? The FSF sees copyright assignment to the FSF as necessary to allow it to defend the code against GPL violations, while the XEmacs developers have argued that the lack of copyright assignment has allowed major companies to get involved, as so… A nonpartisan account of the state of XEmacs in its twilight. Something like OpenKomodo?Or did you really mean integrating the capabilities in Firefox itself? For me, i started to use emacs in 1998, and from 1998-2005, i'm using xemacs 100% of the time purely for practical reasons. I really wish there was a book on JavaScript that wasn't centered on use in web PAGES.it's Turing complete, I can do whatever I want with it, and right now I want to better understand my /.conkerorrc folder's contents and the Conkeror source.In any case, in a couple years, I'm willing to bet I won't be using Emacs much, despite my increased use of it at the moment.Part of me is a bit sad, as I like Lisps. The original EMacs used ITS TECO as it's extension language. It's often more fun to be captain of a small boat than a deckhand on a big ship. Where did this idea come from? Everything up to now has been more or less a rehash of the same old XEmacs story, without anything fundamentally new. It's an emacs-inspired web browser built on top of XUL. A diplomatic description of the differences, techincal and otherwise, between Emacs and XEmacs. The you might like http://aquamacs.org/Think GNU Emacs but it behaves like a Mac application. It does this without performance penalty by not only embedding an interpreter in the editor, but a full compiler, and one that does pretty well in the performance shootouts.I just need to find the time.... We work on XEmacs because it's more fun to work on this code than on other code. Point is, use both. I say this from experience. I no more notice what commands I am using, 99% of the time, than I notice what muscles I am using to type them.The only problems I've had is that "vi" is usually Vim on modern systems, and all versions of Vim before 7.0 were abysmal implementations of "ex". I am curious about the prospects of that project. Here are the most useful find replace commands for current file. However, to change it in atypical way, such as modernize its documentation out of its 1980's context and writing in a systematic non-trivial update, or modernize its GUI out of the build up from 1980's ways, or, as you suggest, introducing or integrating or embracing some VM... am afraid will be nigh impossible, or take a long, long, long, time.For me, i feel the most urgent change emacs needs is a few basic interface changes, detailed here: http://xahlee.org/emacs/modernization.htmlThe most effective method to make a stratedgic change, is, like Xemacs has done, or as Aquamacs has done, by simply having a capable person fork his own version with his vision, out in the public. What I mean is, it made sense 20 years ago to have a terminal-non-GUI environment that is in itself almost an operating system.But considering that we now live in a GUI world, be it Macs, Windows and even Linux with Gnome/KDE in spite of its 'terminal' heritage.I don't need and I really don't want to have a text-based web browser within my editor. Xah xah@xahlee.org∑ http://xahlee.org/☄. LWN.net re-visits the emacs-devel mailing list, where the Emacs 28 development cycle has revived discussions about how to make the text editor more "modern" and attractive to new users: A default dark theme may not be in the future, leading one to think that there may yet be hope for the world in general. Yet, my peers know even less about editing, and want me to make the big sweeping changes, because all they know is copy and paste. @sonoflilit well, kind of.As I said, I am not an Emacs user and that's the point: learning-curve. I was already a doubting thomas, but Aquamacs put the final stake in it (of course, RMS doesn't like Aquamacs either, but that's another story). Dead Keys On some non-English systems running Linux, trying to type an accented character, for example with a tilde ( ~ ), will result in Emacs spitting out “ is undefined”. I try to imagine integrating Ruby's object system into e-lisp or trying to call a macro from Python, and it seems like that for the languages to interoperate, you'd have to loose the a lot of the meta-programming techiniques from all languages which make them so popular in the first place, or, at least restrict them so they don't carry over between languages. That warmonger VIM is sitting back and laughing at us. > Port to XUL, maybe?Are you familiar with conkeror? To the Textmate/Mac user: check out Aquamacs at aquamacs.org -- it's an OS X / Aqua port of Emacs. At least not on me but in some beta version and then also during some migration from Xfree to Xorgs X11 variant. It offered features that Emacs didn’t have, and therefore caused a schism among Emacs users. The main ones are: GNU, GNU/Linux, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD, MacOS, MS Windows and Solaris. > As soon as emacs gets proportional anti-aliased fonts, I'll switch. I think he's nominalizing the verb "to blog²" to create a new noun "blog³", like this: I borked this yesterday -> I made a bork yesterday I grokked something today -> I had a grok today I blogged² about OSX -> I worked on a blog³ about OSX.That there was already a noun "blog¹" with a different meaning is irrelevant to this proccess; what matters is that the verb "to blog²" means "to create a blog¹ post", not "to create a blog¹". Now they have two problems. Several of XEmacs's principal developers have published accounts of the split between XEmacs and GNU Emacs, for example, Stephen Turnbull's summary of the arguments from both sides. What of it? I am glad I did.I just wish all the brains developing for emacs would get back under the same tent. I think something got garbled in transmission. In EmacsAsOperatingSystem and UnixCulture there is the comment that "Emacs is a refugee from the long dead culture of LispMachines. Monnier is an Emacs maintainer. Last time I looked the core pieces of Emacs were still written in C.Still, Emacs has some really attractive properties: it's extensible (of course) and it's reflective (or perhaps introspective) in that its extension language can inspect and modify itself. Thanks Stevey, you have also inspired me to get cracking at improving rails-mode for emacs. Extending it with C, the way most extensions do has one fatal flaw...a bad extension can crash the browser. The CLR is *not* winning the multiple languages race, though they're making a good showing and catching up quickly. xemacs free download. Probably the XEmacs supplied malloc could be removed too as dead code but, who knows, on some old system that could still be useful!? And Gabriel dispairs that really good looking Lisp code runs really slow. To be clear, nothing here is firsthand information. Out of curiosity and for some research I tried to look into the current state of the project and found that the site www.xemacs.org appears to be unreachable. I've heard that on the #emacs irc people mention how emacs needs to be rewritten and that emacs as a whole is dying since many users are older users and emacs is picking up newer users slower. I made the point that all it really needs is a solid text editing component that can handle all the stuff you need for a typical editor (syntax highlighting, mainly), and the rest is relatively simple. It reminds me of my beloved save-tabs-on-exit in Firefox 3b5. My one missing feature is good tab completion in the M-x compile minibuffer.

Best Community Development Corporations, Handmade Marbles Uk, Strawberry Cake Cookies With Cream Cheese, Withings Body Cardio Scale Manual, Calendula Homeopathy Cream, Best Biohacks Reddit, Prague Weather October, Short Proverbs About Life,

Post a Comment